|
|
VOLUME 10, NUMBER 14 APRIL
4 , 2003
To: Members
From: David Crothers, Executive Vice President
As you will note during a review of the telecommunications
legislation in this week's Legislative Report, many of the bills that
we have been following are being decided...either favorably or unfavorably.
Those that were passed by both houses are now being signed by the Governor.
A notable exception are the appropriations bills that
remain, including those of the Public Service Commission and Information
Technology Department. Members of the legislature will wait until the
final few days of the session to fund the Information Technology Department's
appropriation because of the significant amount of dollars and their desire
to modify the agency's mission.
Among the items being discussed are proposals to restrict
ITD's efforts to serve private sector entities such as hospitals, nursing
homes and privately owned healthcare clinics. The Association has argued
that it is bad public policy and that independent telephone companies
would be unable to continue to invest and modernize their telecommunications
networks if the State of North Dakota were to offer taxpayer-subsidized
competition for customers.
The Association has shared that message with the Governor,
the majority leaders and minority leaders in both houses of the legislature
and healthcare professionals.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of the bills or thoughts on how to make our Legislative Report more
informative.
HB 1022 The legislation provides for the Information Technology
Department's two-year appropriation, as well as allowing the State to
sell $20 million in bonds to fund ConnectND. The Information Technology
Department is requesting $108.1 million for the biennium and anticipates
recovering $97.6 million in revenues. The Association was extremely gratified
by language adopted by House Appropriators that prohibits ITD from selling
services to the public. A new provision, section 10, was added: ITD "may
provide wide area network services to a State agency, city, county, school
district, or other political subdivision in this State. The information
technology department may not provide wide area network services to any
private, charitable or nonprofit entity." The Association strongly
supports the language prohibiting the State from offering services to
the public. The provisions came under harsh attack from ITD, Higher Education,
North Dakota Public Health and The Hospital Association during the bill's
first hearing in Senate Appropriations. Each of the groups opposed the
new language and ITD said it was "bad public policy."
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Feb. 18 |
Appropriations Committee Recommended
"Do Pass", As Amended, 19-4. |
| Feb. 19 |
House Passed 72-17. Emergency
Claused Carried. |
| Feb. 27 |
Senate Appropriations Committee
Hearing. |
HB 1043 The bill seeks to resolve a number of issues for administering
the Information Technology Department (ITD) regarding the date State agencies
must submit their "technology plans" to ITD, eliminates obsolete
microfilm units and eliminates the State Information Technology Advisory
Committee. The Committee's role is to advise ITD regarding statewide information
technology planning, including providing electronic government services
for citizens and businesses, developing technology infrastructure to support
economic development and workforce training, and developing other statewide
information. This bill also expands the authority of ITD to purchase,
finance or lease "implementation services" to carry out their
mission.
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. Referred to Government
and Veterans Affairs Committee. |
| Feb. 14 |
Government and Veterans Affairs
Committee Recommended "Do Pass", As Amended, 13-0. |
| Feb. 18 |
House Passed 93-0. |
| Feb. 26 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Mar. 10 |
Government and Veterans Affairs
Committee Recommended "Do Pass", As Amended, 6-0. |
| Mar. 12 |
Senate Passed 46-0. |
HB 1052 The proposal reflects the agreement between Qwest and the
Public Service Commission to monitor the telephone company's compliance
obligations in providing interstate long distance services. Before Qwest
was allowed to provide those long distance services they demonstrated
to the Public Service Commission their compliance with a 14 point checklist
determined by the Federal Communications Commission. This legislation
established a Performance Assurance Plan, which will be used by the Public
Service Commission to monitor the operation and effect of Qwest's entry
into the interstate market.
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 9 |
Industry, Business and Labor Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 14-0. |
| Jan. 10 |
House Passed 89-1. Emergency
Claused Carried. |
| Feb. 10 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Mar. 7 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 5-0. |
| Mar. 10 |
Rereferred to Appropriations
Committee. |
| Mar. 18 |
Senate Passed, As Amended,
43-0. |
| Mar. 27 |
Signed by Governor. |
HB 1053 The proposal sought to continue the life of the Regulatory
Reform Review Commission (RRRC) through December 31, 2004. The RRRC's
authority to exist ended on the last day of December 2002 and needed to
be reinstated by the legislative body. The 5 person Commission is designed
to review ongoing telecommunications developments, both legislative and
regulatory, and report back to the full legislature with recommendations
for preserving and advancing telecommunications services for the State's
citizens.
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 13 |
Industry Business and Labor Committee Recommended "Do Not Pass" 14-0 |
| Jan. 14 |
House Defeated 89-1 |
HB 1105 Legislation introduced at the request of the Tax Commissioner
to amend and clarify telecommunications taxation laws. Among the changes
is language to include mobile wireless carriers in the tax statute, refund
procedures for telephone companies and customers, and gives the Tax Commissioner
discretion to waive penalties.
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 14 |
Finance and Tax Committee Recommended "Do Not Pass" 13-0 |
| Jan. 15 |
House Passed 91-0 |
| Feb. 11 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Feb. 26 |
Finance and Taxation Committee
Hearing Recommended "Do Pass" 6-0. |
| Feb. 27 |
Senate Passed 38-8. |
| Mar. 27 |
Signed by Governor. |
HB 1132 A bill that would require resellers of telecommunications
services to acquire an annual license each year before they would be allowed
to do business in the State of North Dakota. Public Service Commissioners
Wefald and Clark testified that the measure was necessary to monitor which
resellers were still offering service in the State. The Association testified
against the measure before the Senate Industry, Business and Labor committee
and said that the information the PSC sought was available from a number
of other State agencies. Association
Position Paper
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 14 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 12-1. |
| Jan. 23 |
House Passed 66-24 |
| Feb. 11 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Mar. 4 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Not Pass" 7-0. |
| Mar. 5 |
Senate Defeated 38-10. |
HB 1133 Legislation introduced at the request of the Public Service
Commission that would require each telecommunications company, electric
utility, gas utility and pipeline utility to pay the PSC a $100 fee annually.
The PSC estimates 650 utilities would be subject to the measure. The Association
testified against the proposal and told committee members that there should
be some demonstration of need for the money. The bill, as written, would
require the monies to be deposited in the State's general fund. Representative
Craig Headland (R-Montpelier), a director at Dakota Central Telecommunications
and other supporters of the independent telephone industry effectively
created a groundswell of opposition on the floor. Association
Position Paper
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 14 |
Industry, Business and Labor Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 11-2. |
| Jan. 23 |
House Defeated 54-37. |
HB 1134 In North Dakota,
it is law that customers have the right to purchase "essential telecommunications
services" separate from other telecom services that a telephone company
offers. Under this proposal, only telephone companies that "provides essential telecommunications services"
must be required to offer essential services only. It was introduced because
there are a number of telecommunications carriers operating in the State who do not offer essential services to the public
and should not be required to unbundle those services.
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 14 |
Industry, Business and Labor Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 14-0. |
| Jan. 23 |
House Passed 87-0. |
| Feb. 11 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Feb. 28 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 7-0. |
| Mar. 3 |
Senate Passed 45-0. |
| Mar. 12 |
Signed by Govenor. |
HB 1135 The Public Service Commission in this bill is requesting
the authority to resolve numbering issues such as the recent implementation
of 211 (Mental Health), 511 (State Transportation) and future N11 assignments,
as well as jurisdiction over future area codes. Separately, the Commission
also seeks to have language dropped that limits their authority to impose
obligations on telephone companies that are greater or different than
Federal obligations. The Association joined Qwest in opposition to the Commission's attempt to expand the scope of their rulemaking.
The House adopted language before final passage that will allow the Commission
to implement orders "different" from Federal rules but deleted
their ability to adopt orders "greater" than the Federal Communications Commission promulgates. The Association supports the amended
bill.Association
Position Paper
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 28 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Pass", As amended, 14-0. |
| Jan. 30 |
House Passed 88-1. |
| Feb. 11 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Feb. 28 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 7-0. |
| Mar. 3 |
Senate Passed 45-0. |
| Mar. 12 |
Signed by Governor. |
HB 1284 Legislation that would prohibit telecommunications companies
from selling or disclosing information, including any profiling information,
about their customers. Telecommunications companies that violate the proposed
law would be subject to both criminal and civil prosecution. The Association
has expressed its concern that this would prohibit actions as simple as
selling customer names, addresses and telephone numbers to competing telephone
directory companies. The Association urged Industry, Business and Labor
committee members to oppose the
measure during a hearing on HB 1284 and testified that Federal law in
many instances dictated our disclosure of customer information.
| Jan. 13 |
Introduced in House. |
| Feb. 6 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Not Pass" 14-0. |
| Feb. 10 |
House Defeated 93-1. |
HB 1314 A bill to expand the North Dakota One
Call ( Call Before You Dig) law to exempt excavations down to a depth
of 24 inches. Under the current law, a excavator can only dig to 18 inches
before calling North Dakota One Call. Additionally, sponsors of the bill
have also added language that would allow excavations down to a depth
of 18 inches in the right- of-way of a road or highway. The Association
believes that sponsors of the bill are responding to the requests of soil
testers operating in the State who take many, many samples from a single field. Committee Chairman
Glen Froseth (R-Kenmare) appointed a subcommittee of legislators, soil
samplers and utilities at the conclusion of the hearing and asked them to try and resolve their differences. The Association participated
in those meetings.
| Jan. 13 |
Introduced in House. |
| Feb. 5 |
Political Subdivisions Committee
Recommended "Do Not Pass" 14-0. |
| Feb. 7 |
House Defeated 58-33. |
HB 1363 Legislation that will reduce the amount of time that the
Public Service Commission may suspend a utility's price increase or decrease
from seven months to five months. Under existing law, whenever a company
files a contract, price change, contract or new rule with the Commission
the agency has the ability to "suspend" that action for up to
seven months after the change was to take effect. This bill will reduce
the time frame to five months.
| Jan. 16 |
Introduced in House. |
| Feb. 3 |
Government and Veterans Affairs
Committee Recommended "Do Pass", As Amended, 13-1. |
| Feb. 5 |
House Passed 94-0. |
| Feb. 18 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Apr. 2 |
Government and Veterans Affairs
Committee Recommended "Do Pass", As Amended, 6-0. |
| Apr. 3 |
Senate passed
46-0. |
HB 1364 A bill that would extend the jurisdiction of the Public
Service Commission to include cable television lines and other wires that
are attached to poles to the definition of "communication lines".
Currently, the statute gives the Commission authority to regulate raising
and lowering electric and communications lines on the poles.
| Jan. 16 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 30 |
Government and Veterans Affairs
Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 13-0. |
| Feb. 10 |
House Passed 93-0. |
| Feb. 18 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Mar. 27 |
Government and Veterans Affairs
Committee Recommended "Do Not Pass" 4-2. |
| Apr. 1 |
Senate Defeated 33-14. |
HB 1388 A proposal
by sponsors to implement an "anti-spam" law in North Dakota
that seeks to limit the number of misleading e-mails, require commercial
e-mails to notify the recipient in the subject line and provide remedies
for violations of the law. The Senate Judiciary Committee heavily amended
the legislation passed by the House of Representatives and removed many
of the obligations imposed on Internet Service Providers. The amendments
were suggested by Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem and supported by the
bill's main sponsor, Representative John Warner. Mr. Stenehjem said the
new language found in House Bill 1388 closely resembled a law adopted
in the State of Washington, where the language has been defended in court.
Both of the original and revised versions of House Bill 1388 require commercial
electronic mail messages to include "ADV" in the subject line.
"ADV-ADULT" must be in the subject line if the material is of
a sexual nature. Both versions of the bill also require the sender to
establish a toll-free telephone number, a return electronic mail address
or other means to enable the recipient of the commercial e-mail to notify
the sender to stop sending commercial mail. The legislation also provides
for penalties ranging from $500 to $1,000 for violations of the law.
| Jan. 20 |
Introduced in House. |
| Feb. 13 |
Judiciary Committee Recommended
"Do Pass", As Amended, 11-2. |
| Feb. 18 |
House Passed 89-4. |
| Feb. 26 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Mar. 14 |
Judiciary Committee Recommended
"Do Pass", As Amended, 6-0. |
| Mar. 18 |
Senate Passed 43-0. |
SB 2008 The two-year appropriation for the North Dakota Public
Service Commission (PSC). The Commission is asking for $10.1 million and
anticipates income of $6.1 million during the biennium.
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in House. |
| Jan. 20 |
Appropriations Committee Hearing. |
| Jan. 24 |
Appropriations Committee Hearing. |
| Feb. 18 |
Appropriations Committee Recommended
"Do Pass", As Amended, 12-0. |
| Feb. 19 |
Senate Passed 46-0. |
| Feb. 26 |
Introduced in House |
| Mar. 4 |
Appropriations Committee Hearing. |
SB 2042 A bill that was introduced at the request of the Information
Technology Department (ITD) that would have allowed school districts or
institutions of higher learning to allow members of the public to use
State facilities for "videoconferencing or associated network services"
when a private provider is unavailable and allowing the access "does
not inhibit future private provider service." The Association strongly
opposed this measure and said it was bad public policy for government
to compete against private industry. The bill was heavily amended during
committee hearings to not only remove the language that would have allowed
the sale of State communications services to the public, but also removed
"nonprofits" from the statute's existing language, as well.
Members of the Association were very pleased with the outcome of the bill,
which passed unanimously in the Senate. It is important to remember, however,
that the section of the North Dakota Century Code that this particular
language is located only describes which services are exempt from Public
Service Commission regulation. We continue to be gravely concerned about any proposals by the State to offer telecom- munications
services to the public. Association
Position Paper
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Jan. 17 |
Education Committee Recommended
"Do Not Pass" 4-2. |
| Jan. 20 |
Rereferred to Education Committee.
|
| Jan. 29 |
Education Committee Recommended
"Do Pass" 6-0. |
| Jan. 30 |
Senate Passed 47-0. |
| Feb. 3 |
Introduced in House. |
| Mar. 4 |
Education Committee Recommended
"Do Not Pass" 13-0. |
| Mar. 5 |
House Defeated 86-5. |
SB 2064 A State Radio
proposal that requires fees collected under the 911 wireless provisions
of State law to be charged and paid to the political subdivisions that
enter into contracts with State Radio. Current statutes allow counties
with fewer than 20,000 residents to receive their 911 service from State
Radio. Today, there are 23 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP's) in
the State. An additional 22 counties have their calls answered by State
Radio. A representative from the Association of Counties testified that
Phase I, which will give the wireless telephone number and location of the tower, is to be operational by mid-summer 2003.
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Jan. 15 |
Industry, Business and Labor Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 7-0. |
| Jan. 21 |
Referred to Appropriations Committee. |
| Jan. 28 |
Appropriations Committee Recommended
"Do Pass" 14-0. |
| Jan. 29 |
Senate Passed 47-0. |
| Feb. 3 |
Introduced in House. |
| Mar. 3 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 13-0. |
| Mar. 4 |
Rereferred to Appropriations
Committee. |
| Mar. 11 |
Appropriations Committee Hearing. |
| Mar. 27 |
Appropriations Committee Recommended
"Do Pass" 20-0. |
| Mar. 28 |
Senate Passed 73-2. |
SB 2116 Legislation introduced at the request of the Public Service
Commission (PSC) that would require local telecommunications companies,
as well as providers of intrastate telecommunications services to provide
a notice to customers any time there is a price increase. Local telcos
would be required to give notice at least fifteen days beforehand if there
is an increase of more than 1 percent for essential local exchange service,
as well as a 1 day notice if there is in increase of more than 5 percent
for any nonessential local exchange service. Providers of intrastate service
would be required to give any presubscribed customer a 1 day notice if
there was a change in the terms or conditions of that service that results
in a price increase. The Association testified against the measure and
told members of the committee that local telephone companies and North
Dakota Long Distance has an outstanding record of notifying customers
of changes in their telephone bills. Associaton
Position Papers
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Jan. 21 |
Industry, Business and Labor Committee Recommended "Do Not Pass" 6-1. |
| Jan. 22 |
Senate Defeated 35-12. |
SB 2117 This proposal
is captioned as modifying the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission
to assess costs to public utilities for their rate hearings, but the language
limits the PSC authority to rate proceedings affecting gas or electric public utilities. It is not applicable to the
telephone industry at this time, but the Association will monitor to ensure
that the concept is not expanded.
| Jan. 7 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Jan. 21 |
Industry, Business and Labor Committee Recommended "Do Not Pass" 5-2. |
| Jan. 22 |
Senate Defeated 47-0. |
SB 2192 Legislation that extends the immunity from liability that
telephone providers receive when providing access to emergency systems
to include automated notification systems. Those systems are identified
as, "a telecommunications system that provides rapid notice of emergency
situations to the public through a public safety answering point."
The immunity is also extended to public agencies, public safety agencies and
wireless providers, as well as employees and agents of those entities.
The immunity does not exist in instances of willful misconduct or gross
negligence.
| Jan. 13 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Feb. 3 |
Judiciary Committee Recommended
Amended, 6-0. |
| Feb. 4 |
Senate Passed 46-0. |
| Feb. 12 |
Introduced in House. |
| Mar. 17 |
Judiciary Committee Recommended
"Do Pass", As Amended, 12-0. |
| Mar. 19 |
House Passed 92-0. |
SB 2231 Legislation introduced at the request of Qwest that eliminates
the Essential Telecommunications Price Factor (ETPF) formula used by Qwest
and other price cap companies to determine the amount of increases permissible
by law. It applies to both local and intrastate toll access rates. The
ETPF factor is determined annually by the Public Service Commission. While
the PSC does not regulate the rates of cooperatives and independents with
fewer than 8,000 lines, the agency does regulate those companies' access
rates. The conventional wisdom is that the ETPF, which was adopted by
the State of North Dakota in 1989, had become less and less relevant in
an era of reduced access rates and deregulation of the industry. It also
proved to not be a very significant factor and resulted in minuscule increases
or decreases each year. Testimony in the Senate Industry, Business and
Labor Committee instead focused on two other provisions of the legislation,
including the appropriate demarcation line between customer and telecommunications
company for inside wire and a compacted time that customers may recover
damages or refunds when a telco has violated the law or Commission order.
Before passage by the Senate, committee members amended the bill to double
Qwest's proposed statute of limitations from one year to two years from
when the complaint was filed.
| Jan. 20 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Feb. 4 |
Senate Industry, Business
and Labor Committee Recommended "Do Pass", As Amended 6-0. |
| Feb. 5 |
Senate Passed 47-0. |
| Feb. 12 |
Introduced in House. |
| Mar. 10 |
Industry, Business and Labor
Committee Recommended "Do Pass" 14-0. |
| Mar. 13 |
House Passed 92-0. |
| Mar. 27 |
Signed by Governor. |
SB 2255 The legislation establishes what is commonly called a "Do
Not Call" list. The bill will set rules for when telemarketers may
call and gives individuals the ability to register their telephone number
as one that should not be called by telemarketers. There are exemptions
in the legislation for telephone solicitations that have been permitted
by the customer or when there is a established personal or business relationship
between the telephone solicitor and the customer. There are also exceptions
for charitable organizations in certain instances, political communications
and sales calls where the actual sale will be made later in a face-to-face
meeting between the caller and customer. Following a request to be included
in the "Do Not Call" database the ban on contacting that number
is effective for five years unless the customer asks that it be revoked.
Consumers who are called after placing their number in the registry may sue for actual damages or up to $2,000 per
occurrence, whichever is greater.
| Jan. 20 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Feb. 10 |
Judiciary Committee Recommended
"Do Pass", As Amended, 5-0. |
| Feb. 12 |
Appropriations Committee Recommended
"Do Pass", As Amended, 5-0. |
| Feb. 13 |
Senate Passed 40-5. |
| Feb. 17 |
Introduced in House. |
| Mar. 24 |
Judiciary Committee Recommended
"Do Pass", As Amended, 10-3. |
| Mar. 25 |
Rereferred to Appropriations. |
| Mar. 28 |
Appropriations Committee Recommended
"Do Pass" 16-5. |
| Mar. 31 |
House Passed 62-30 |
SB 2400 Legislation to protect independent telephone companies
in North Dakota when property in which they have an easement is foreclosed
upon by a county for nonpayment of property taxes. Under current law,
the telephone company's ownership of a easement would revert to the county
when a property owner failed to pay their taxes and the land was lost
in foreclosure. Senator Randy Christmann and Representative Craig Headland
are co-sponsoring the measure, along with Representative Dwight
Wrangham. Language in the bill makes sure that any property interest acquired
by the county in foreclosure is subject to an easement or right-of-way
if properly registered.
| Jan. 27 |
Introduced in Senate. |
| Feb. 13 |
Finance and Taxation Committee
Recommended "Do Pass", As Amended, 6-0. |
| Feb. 14 |
Senate Passed 45-0. |
| Feb. 20 |
Introduced in House. |
| Mar. 5 |
Finance and Taxation Committee
Recommended "Do Pass" 13-0. |
| Mar. 10 |
House Passed 89-0. |
| Mar. 19 |
Signed by Governor. |
CALL YOUR LEGISLATOR TOLL-FREE: 1-888-635-3447
LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER: 328-3373
WEB PAGE ADDRESS: www.state.nd.us/lr/
|